The co‑management approach has positive impacts on mangrove conservation: evidence from the mono transboundary biosphere reserve (Togo‑Benin), West Africa

dc.contributor.authorGNANSOUNOU, Sètondé Constant
dc.contributor.authorSagoe, Alberta Ama
dc.contributor.authorMattah, Precious Agbeko Dzorgbe
dc.contributor.authorSALAKO, Kolawolé Valère
dc.contributor.authorAheto, Denis Worlanyo
dc.contributor.authorGlèlè kakaï, Romain
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-02T16:06:57Z
dc.date.available2026-06-02T16:06:57Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractLiterature on conservation science has documented the increasing use of the co-management approach to effectively conserve natural resources. Although some studies found the co-management approach as highly effective, others also reported some uncertainties associated with the use of this conservation approach. Using the mono transboundary biosphere reserve (MTBR) as a case study, this work assessed the effectiveness of the co-management approach for mangrove conservation in West Africa. Data was collected in two protected sites of the reserve (one in Togo and the other in Benin). Exploratory sequential mixed method via in-depth interviews (n = 17), focus group discussions (n = 14), household surveys (n = 274) and expert-based surveys (n = 10) were carried out, and data was analyzed using the InVEST-based Habitat Risk Assessment (HRA) model, chi-square tests and simple probability of likelihood. Findings showed that the co-management approach has lowered anthropogenic stressors to mangroves in the reserve. Under the co-management approach, all the mangroves located in the Benin side of the reserve are identified as under low risk whereas 42% of the mangrove cover are considered under low risk and 58% under medium risk in Togo. Local perception also portrayed the reduction of mangrove degradation in the study sites following the adoption of the co-management approach in the two countries. However, there are some challenges such as the financial support provision and regular community engagement which need to be thoroughly researched and addressed to achieve the sustainability of the positive impacts of the co-management in the MTBR.
dc.identifier.otherBECDB-11874
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.uac.bj/handle/123456789/10265
dc.language.isofr
dc.relation.ispartofWetlands Ecology and Management
dc.subjectCo-management · Habitat Risk
dc.subjectAssessment · Mangroves · Mono transboundary
dc.subjectbiosphere reserve · West Africa
dc.titleThe co‑management approach has positive impacts on mangrove conservation: evidence from the mono transboundary biosphere reserve (Togo‑Benin), West Africa
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections