METHODS OF WEIGHTS DEFINITION IN MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS

dc.contributor.authorSEMASSOU, GUY CLARENCE
dc.contributor.authorGUIDI, Tognon Clotilde
dc.contributor.authorPRODJINONTO, Vincent
dc.contributor.authorGalimova, Larisa V
dc.contributor.authorVIANOU, COKOU ANTOINE
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-02T16:06:57Z
dc.date.available2026-06-02T16:06:57Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractMain article purpose – the analysis of the advantages and shortcomings for various methods of weight coefficients (WC) determination for factors sets, considered with multicriteria decision making. Five methods are compared: method of cards; AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process); Direct weighting; Fixed point scoring; MACBETH (Measuring Attractiveness by Categorial Based Evaluation Technique). The last method allows to combine two types of information: about preferences of the persons, which making decisions; about importance of criteria and their interactions, limited in couples of criteria. Authors emphasize, that expedient for application of the scheme of WC can depend of the chosen method. For methods of cards; AHP, MACBETH in article are given the concrete examples of their application, which illustrate technique of weight coefficients calculation.
dc.identifier.otherBECDB-1756
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.uac.bj/handle/123456789/1868
dc.language.isofr
dc.relation.ispartofCASPIAN JOURNAL: Management and High Technologies
dc.subjectmulti-criteria analysis
dc.subjectweight schemes
dc.subjectaggregation
dc.subjecthierarchisation
dc.subjectmethod of cards
dc.subjectmethod AHP
dc.subjectmethod MACBETH
dc.titleMETHODS OF WEIGHTS DEFINITION IN MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
eda04741cff16f8f177d5a2a43007c23.pdf
Size:
608.72 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections